Work | Pattern Theory

The assignment is rarely the problem.

Each of these engagements started with a clear brief and ended somewhere else. The write-ups are about how the real question surfaced, and what it changed.

EdReports  /  Education nonprofit

The reports weren't documents anymore. They were products.

A new category of Pre-K evaluation reports had to satisfy several different definitions of “enough evidence” at once, without diluting the rigor behind the review.

Read the EdReports case  →

What didn't fit

Reviewers, districts, and publishers each read the reports differently, and each of them was right.

The proof

A layered path through the evidence, and one of the smoother launches the organization had run.

Oaken  /  Agriculture

UI consistency was the assignment. Institutional continuity was the problem.

A scoped design-system job surfaced a harder question: what should this product actually remember when the owner, the lease, or the people change?

Read the Oaken case  →

What didn't fit

Oaken's best customers were checking every payment in a spreadsheet.

The proof

Institutional memory that was supposed to walk out the door for two months, and instead just kept working.

Third-party logistics  /  Operations

Ninety steps to one invoice, and why the fix wasn't in billing.

A largely undocumented, ninety-step invoicing process traced back to an onboarding form nobody actually completed.

Read the Ninety Steps case  →

What didn't fit

The onboarding form behind every invoice only ever got a sixth of its questions answered.

What changed

The invisible process got mapped, and the fix was placed upstream where the missing information was actually created.

Energy  /  Industrial manufacturing

The holes were on purpose.

A recovered relaunch left an unscoped thread behind: buyers weren't searching the way the company was organised. Fieldwork turned a taxonomy fix into the argument for the year's roadmap.

Read the portfolio mapping case  →

What didn't fit

The navigation was built around internal product names. Buyers didn't search that way.

What changed

A journey map printed at wall size, with deliberate gaps in it, got four divisions to write one roadmap they all owned.

Mercury  /  Life-science logistics

The clues that come when customers build around you

A new platform for a complicated logistics service was drifting toward a design brief. Customers had already built the system they needed out of spreadsheets, email, and their own ingenuity.

Read the Mercury case  →

What didn't fit

Customers trusted the squads. What wore them down was not knowing where their shipments stood.

What changed

A home screen that did three things: track, pickup, ship. The rest was sorted into software, automation, or the squads.

What are you trying to figure out?

Send me the mess as you see it. Don't diagnose, just a high level overview and I'll respond with what catches my attention.

∗ No calls. No pitches. Just a thoughtful response.

{{ formNote }}